Legal Opinion

Twombly v. Framingham Gas, Fuel & Power Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 27, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The defendant admitted that the trees on the plaintiff’s estate were killed by gas, and the only issues were, whether their death was caused by the defendant’s negligence, to which the plaintiff’s negligence had also contributed.

The plaintiff introduced evidence, that, her attention having been called to the trees and to the odor of gas in the highway in front of them, she spoke to the tree warden, and shortly after telephoned to the defendant and told the person *55who answered about the odor. The jury could find, that, shortly after, the defendant’s employees were seen digging in the street…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Jennings v. RooneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. McGenness v. Adriatic MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  4. Simmons v. PooleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. City of Salem v. Salem Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lord v. Lowell Institution for SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Pellon v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  3. Liquori v. Republican Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  4. Broad-Bridge Corp. v. DulchinosMassachusetts District Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API