Legal Opinion

Merrill v. Bachelder

California Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1899No. S. F. No. 1472PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County, and from an order denying a new trial. S. K. Dougherty, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The defendant is the administratrix of the estate of Joseph E. Bachelder, deceased, and as such administra*675trix advertised for sale certain parcels of real estate as a portion of the estate of her intestate. The plaintiff alleges in her complaint herein that she is the owner in fee of the said real estate, and seeks to restrain the defendant from selling or from offering the same for sale, upon the ground that her title thereto will be clouded. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant has appealed therefrom, and from an order denying a new trial. The allegations of…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. McPike v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Hise v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Estate of MajtanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Everett v. Cutler MillsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1932
  5. Boyd v. WoodruffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API