Legal Opinion
Marcus v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 16, 1973No. 126-72PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, Judge
Plaintiff is suing for pay allegedly due him as the result of an illegal discharge from a position as a Social Insurance Representative at the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW). The basis of plaintiff’s claim is that he was denied the procedural safeguards guaranteed him by the Veterans’ Preference Act of 1944. The present codification of that Act, 5 U.S.'C. §§ 1511-12 (1970), states in pertinent part:
* * * “preference eligible employee” means a permanent or indefinite preference eligible who has completed *546a probationary or trial period as an employee of an Executive agency *…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tierney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Dargo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Bander v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tecom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- William F. Grigsby and the National Weather Service Employees Organization v. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Weather ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Nilofer Pervez v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Vladimir Kogan, Md v. the United States of America 1United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- General Accounting Office v. General Accounting Office Personnel Appeals Board, Morris L. Shaller, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983