Legal Opinion

Gwinnett County v. Archer

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1960No. 38552PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

The county is the proper party plaintiff. Gwinnett County v. Archer, ante.

In regard to the general demurrer filed by the defendants, several aspects emerge. First, whether or not there was enough to amend by, and secondly, whether or not the statute of limitation had run against the defendants. There is no merit to the contention of the defendants that the original petition, after being stricken, contained nothing to amend by. (The defendants say as much in their brief.) With the exception of the paragraphs relating to the G & H Supply Co., the amended petition is almost…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woodruff v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Nail v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  3. Southeastern Stages v. AbdellaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. Cook v. CommissionersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Archer v. Gwinnett CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Archer v. Gwinnett CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API