Chilton v. Thum
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARD, Presiding Judge.
Employers, Joseph and Maries Thum, appeal from the circuit court’s order sustaining an award to claimant, James Chilton, by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. On appeal employers claim that the evidence does not support the finding that they elected to come under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Chapter 287, RSMo. Supp.1975 (hereinafter the Act).
We review the facts in the light most favorable to Commission’s decision, Webb v. Norbert Markway Const. Co., 522 S.W.2d 611 (Mo.App.1975). But the question of whether the facts, thus reviewed, are sufficient to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Merriman v. Ben Gutman Truck Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Miller v. Municipal Theatre Ass'n of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Webb v. Norbert Markway Construction CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Gordon v. Puritan Chemical CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
- McClain v. Yellow Cab Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Brown v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Scott v. Edwards Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Argenia, Inc. v. BlasingameCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
- Scott v. Edwards Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991