Legal Opinion

Moreland v. Hortman

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 7, 2001No. CA 00-527PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOSEPHINE Linker Hart, Judge.

In this case, appellant, Marilee Moreland, argues that it was improper for the chancellor to consolidate the child-support case involving her child by her former spouse, appellee, Robert J. Hortman, with a child-support case involving appellee’s child by another woman. Further, appellant argues that the chancellor erred in determining appellee’s child-support payment for her child by considering appellant as having two dependents. Finally, she argues that the chancellor erred in finding a change of circumstances supporting a reduction in child support. We reverse…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pennington v. Harvest Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. In Re Guidelines for Child SupportSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Arkansas Department of Human Services Child Support Enforcement Unit v. ForteCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Payton v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Ritchey v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mainerich v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API