Legal Opinion

Ragan v. Protko

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 28, 1978No. 77-457PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jones

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendant Gerald Protko, a tavern operator, in an action brought under section 14 of article VI of the Liquor Control Act, commonly referred to as the Dramshop Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 43, par. 135).

Plaintiffs, Marvin R. and Imogene Ragan, are the parents of Cyrus Ragan, deceased, who was 21 years old at the time of the accident that is relevant to this cause. The instant action was commenced to recover for injury to their “property” resulting from the intoxication of their son. See Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 43, par. 135.

The primary…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Graul v. AdrianIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Hernandez v. DiazIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Danley v. HibbardIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Haw v. 1933 Grill, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  5. Fortner v. NorrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Currin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Maras v. BertholdtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Rodgers v. Consolidated RR Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Strandell v. Jackson County, Ill.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1986
  5. Thompson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API