Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Schell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 2, 1987No. 16-84-04532; CA A39526PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendants appeal from a summary judgment for plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) in this action on a promissory note. In their first two assignments, defendants challenge the granting of plaintiffs summary judgment motion and the denial of their own “cross-motion.” The issue on which those assignments turn is whether defendants are foreclosed by federal law from asserting affirmative defenses against FDIC which arise out of defendants’ transaction with the defunct bank from which FDIC acquired the note.

FDIC is the receiver under ORS 711.465 for Emerald Empire Banking Co.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Charles HatmakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Loan Investors, L.P. v. MartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. HarschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. HelmCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API