Shrader v. Maultz
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McGLOON
Plaintiff Gerald Shrader obtained a default judgment against defendant Leo Maultz for damages arising out of an automobile collision. Plaintiff successfully filed an affidavit of garnishment and summons on defendant’s bank account for the amount of the judgment. The account consisted solely of funds derived from defendant’s pension under the Railroad Retirement Act.
Defendant’s motion to dismiss the garnishment was denied. Also dismissed was defendant’s subsequent motion to reconsider. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred in garnishing his pension inasmuch as it is exempt…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Porter v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Commonwealth v. BerfieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Friedman & Rochester, Ltd. v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- East Moline Works Credit Union v. LinnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Auto Owners Insurance v. BerkshireAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Fayette County Hospital v. ReavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Brosamer v. MarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Perkins v. KocherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Elkins v. ElkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1993