Childs v. Ragonese
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1DissentCole, J.
I agree with the majority that § 14-105 of the Real Property Article does not apply to auctioneers. I disagree, however, that, under the circumstances of this case, an auctioneer is an agent who is not entitled to a commission when the purchaser fails to carry out the contract of sale. I, therefore, respectfully dissent.
An auctioneer is an agent who is authorized to sell goods or real estate at a public sale. City of Chicago v. Ornstein, *141323 Ill. 258, 154 N.E. 100 (1926). When an auctioneer’s authority is based upon an express contract the terms of the contract govern. Wilcher v. Mcquire,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blossom v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Forbes v. Wells Beach Casino, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Matthews v. LinnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
- Anderson v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Lott v. DelmarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.