Legal Opinion

Meissner v. Murphy

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 18, 1982No. 26743, CA A21378PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

The issue in this case is whether plaintiff, by failing to file a claim against decedent’s estate before bringing an action for specific performance of a land sale contract between herself and the decedent, is barred from recovering a deficiency judgment in the action.

On May 6, 1979, plaintiff executed an installment sale contract to sell timber land to Steve Wilber. After! Wilber’s death in January, 1980, defendant Wilber’s per sonal representative ceased making payments on the con tract. On November 10, 1980, plaintiff filed an actio: against defendant for specific performance, praying fo…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Renard v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Teel v. WinstonOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Schaefer v. SellarOregon Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ottley v. Estate of BellSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  2. Beach First National Bank v. Estate of GurnhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  3. Balthrop v. BerrymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API