Legal Opinion

Excel, Inc. v. Clayton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1967No. 191PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, C.J.

Excel manufactures textile handling equipment and other tangible property at its plant in Lincolnton, North Carolina, for sale as a retailer both in North Carolina and outside of the State. A sales tax is a tax on the freedom of purchase, and, when applied to interstate transactions, is a tax on the privilege of doing interstate commerce, creates a burden on interstate commerce and runs counter to the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution. McLeod v. Dilworth Co., 322 U.S. 327, 88 L. Ed. 1304; Johnston v. Gill, Comr. of Revenue, 224 N.C. 638, 32 S.E. 2d 30.

Incidental interstate…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McLeod v. J. E. Dilworth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Superior Oil Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Department of Treasury v. Wood Preserving Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Superior Coal Co. v. Department of FinanceIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  5. International Harvester Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dodgen Industries, Inc. v. Iowa State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  2. Gregory Poole Equipment Co. v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Quad Graphics, Inc. v. N.C. Dep't of RevenueNorth Carolina Business Court · 2021
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API