Excel, Inc. v. Clayton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, C.J.
Excel manufactures textile handling equipment and other tangible property at its plant in Lincolnton, North Carolina, for sale as a retailer both in North Carolina and outside of the State. A sales tax is a tax on the freedom of purchase, and, when applied to interstate transactions, is a tax on the privilege of doing interstate commerce, creates a burden on interstate commerce and runs counter to the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution. McLeod v. Dilworth Co., 322 U.S. 327, 88 L. Ed. 1304; Johnston v. Gill, Comr. of Revenue, 224 N.C. 638, 32 S.E. 2d 30.
Incidental interstate…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McLeod v. J. E. Dilworth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Superior Oil Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Department of Treasury v. Wood Preserving Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Superior Coal Co. v. Department of FinanceIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
- International Harvester Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dodgen Industries, Inc. v. Iowa State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Gregory Poole Equipment Co. v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Quad Graphics, Inc. v. N.C. Dep't of RevenueNorth Carolina Business Court · 2021
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1975