Legal Opinion

Armbrust v. Golden

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 31, 1992No. 1901317PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Charles and Ellen Armbrust appeal from an injunction prohibiting them from operating a garage in violation of certain restrictive covenants applicable to their subdivision. The plaintiffs, James M. Golden, Elaine Golden, and other residents of the Lazy Acres Subdivision, had sought the injunction against Charles and Ellen Armbrust to prohibit them from operating a garage business within the subdivision. The trial court denied the defendants' request for a jury trial and, after an ore tenus hearing, determined that the restrictive covenants applicable to the subdivision were not ambiguous and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. Albertville Nursing Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. King v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. McCrary v. ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Meriwether v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jepsen v. CamassarConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. Nunley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Bluffs Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. AdamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API