Legal Opinion

Lamartiniere v. Rachal

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1961No. 299Published

1Opinion of the Court

FRUGÉ, Judge.

This is a suit for damages allegedly caused by the removal of certain equipment from plaintiff’s premises by Sim Rachal and Esso Standard Oil Company, defendants herein. From an adverse judgment Esso Standard Oil Company prosecutes this appeal. Plaintiff has neither appealed nor answered the appeal.

Plaintiff is the owner of certain property which he used as an “Esso Filling Station” by renting it to others. He purchased the property from Mrs. W. D. Smith, et al. in September, 1950, “ * * * together with all buildings and improvements”. When he purchased the property certain…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bagents v. Crowell Long Leaf Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Menendez v. Katz Furniture Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Mengel Co. v. RazianoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Tatar v. MunsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API