Legal Opinion
Ministry of Defense & Support for the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. Cubic Defense Systems, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided November 26, 2002No. CIV. 98CV1165(RMB)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR JUDICIAL DETERMINATION THAT ITS JUDGMENT AGAINST CUBIC DEFENSE SYSTEMS IS IMMUNE FROM ATTACHMENT OR EXECUTION BY STEPHEN M. FLATOW [No. 81] AND DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR JUDICIAL DETERMINATION THAT ITS JUDGMENT AGAINST CUBIC DEFENSE SYSTEMS IS IMMUNE FROM ATTACHMENT OR EXECUTION BY DARIUSH ELAHI [No. 83].
BREWSTER, Senior District Judge.
For the reasons analyzed here below, the Court GRANTS the petitioner’s “Mo tion for Judicial Determination That its Judgment Against Cubic Defense Systems is Immune from Attachment or Execution by Stephen M. Flatow,”…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Elahi v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Covington Industries, Inc. v. Resintex A. G. And Horst SusskindCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Indian Head National Bank of Nashua v. Richard Brunelle, U.S. Marshal for the District of New Hampshire, and Conproco Corporation, Ipa Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Consarc Corporation and Consarc Engineering, Ltd. v. United States Treasury Department, Office of Foreign Assets ControlCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ministry of Defense & Support for the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. Cubic Defense Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Ministry of Defense and Support for Armed Forces of Islamic Republic of Iran v. ElahiSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Ministry of Defense and Support for Armed Forces of Islamic Republic of Iran v. ElahiSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Ministry of Defense & Support for the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. Cubic Defense Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- The Ministry of Defense and Support for the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran, as Successor in Interest to the Ministry of War of the Government of Iran v. Cubic Defense Systems, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Cubic International Sales Corporation v. Stephen M. Flatow, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant, and Dariush Elahi, Plaintiff-Intervenor. The Ministry of Defense and Support for the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran, as Successor in Interest to the Ministry of War of the Government of Iran v. Cubic Defense Systems, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Cubic International Sales Corporation v. Stephen M. Flatow, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant, and Dariush Elahi, Plaintiff-Intervenor. The Ministry of Defense and Support for the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran, as Successor in Interest to the Ministry of War of the Government of Iran v. Cubic Defense Systems, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Cubic International Sales Corporation v. Stephen M. Flatow, Plaintiff-Intervenor, and Dariush Elahi, Plaintiff-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.