Tynan v. Auto Mart
New York Supreme Court
Action to foreclose an attorney’s lien.
1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.
The plaintiff brings action to foreclose a lien which he alleges now subsists by virtue of section 66 of the Code of Civil Procedure, upon a cause of action in which the plaintiff’s assignor, an attorney, represented one *50Anna Gross, who brought action thereon in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, and subsequently compromised and settled said action without paying the plaintiff’s assignor for his services as attorney. The defendant demurs on the ground that the complaint, which sets forth the above facts, fails to state a cause of action. Although it has several times been held that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fischer-Hansen v. . Bklyn. Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Goodrich v. . McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Rooney v. . Second Avenue Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of ReganNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- In re PierisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Duringshoff v. O. B. Coates & Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
- Brooks v. Mandel-Witte Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Brooks v. Mandel-Witte Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932