Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hamm v. City of Rock Hill

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 14, 1964No. 2Published

1DissentJustice Hablan

The Court holds that these state trespass convictions, occurring before the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, must be set aside by virtue of the federal doctrine of criminal abatement. This remarkable conclusion finds no support in reason or authority.

The common-law rule of abatement is basically a canon of construction conceived by the courts as a yardstick for determining whether a legislature, which has enacted a statute making conduct nohcriminal which was proscribed by an earlier criminal statute, also intended to put an end to nonfinal convictions under the former legislation. In…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. Jin Fuey MoySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  5. Bell v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API