Legal Opinion

Broadnax v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 25, 1952PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

57 So.2d 651 (1952)

BROADNAX

v.

STATE.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.

March 25, 1952.

Paul Lake, Tampa, for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Reeves Bowen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

CHAPMAN, Justice.

The appellant, Marion Lee Broadnax, was informed against by the County Solicitor of Hillsborough County, Florida, for unlawfully having in his possession on January 20, 1951, certain implements and devices for conducting a lottery, commonly known as bolita, which lottery was conducted for money, and the implements and devices being duplicate tickets in a lottery yet to be played…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roe v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  2. Ingram v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1940

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lockett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  2. Clark v. SumnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  3. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Diecidue v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API