Hanford v. Blessing
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Kankakee county; the Hon. Hathanibl J. Pillsbury, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield
The purpose of the bill in the present case is to require appellee to account for certain moneys which appellant alleges he advanced for appellee, at his request; also, for a balance due on losses incurred in a certain co-partnership, which for a short time existed between them, and to enjoin the collection of a judgment obtained by appellee against appellant on a promissory note.
So much of the case as relates to the co-partnership may be dismissed from further consideration, with the remark that appellant does not show, by a preponderance of evidence, that he is entitled to recover anything…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Marble v. BonhotelIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fort v. ColbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Gassert v. BogkMontana Supreme Court · 1888
- Baird v. BairdSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Stahl v. DehnMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Sullivan v. WoodsArizona Supreme Court · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.