Legal Opinion

Anthony Denilson Duran v. Christopher Chestnut, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 18, 2026No. 1:26-cv-02020Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY DENILSON DURAN, Case No. 1:26-cv-02020-JLT-CDB (HC) 12 Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS 13 v. CORPUS (A-Number 218-147-608) 14 CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT, et al., (Doc. 1) 15 Respondents. 14-Day Objection Period 16 17 Petitioner Anthony Denilson Duran (“Petitioner”), a federal immigration detainee 18 proceeding pro se, initiated this action on March 13, 2026, with the filing of a petition for writ of 19 habeas corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 2241

and a motion for temporary…

2Cases cited28 opinions

Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.