Legal Opinion

(PC) Allen v. Kramer

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 11, 2020No. 1:15-cv-01609Unknown

1Opinion

41.407 UV □□□ LYALL VL bMVVULITICIIL VO PHM VOrLsicy Payee +vr1re 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID ALLEN, Case No. 1:15-cv-01609-DAD-JDP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO v. RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO 13 SUBSTITUTE DECEASED DEFENDANT STEPHANIE CLENDENIN, et al., 14 ECE No. 97 Defendants. 15 RESPONSE DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS 16 □□ Plaintiff moves to substitute a representative for the deceased defendant Cliff Allenby. 17 ECF No. 97. Plaintiff's motion is unopposed. However, it does not name the person to be 18 substituted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. C. Gilmore v. C. LockardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API