People v. Lugo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant contends that his statutory right to a speedy trial (CPL 30.30) was violated by the prosecution’s failure to exercise due diligence in locating him after a warrant had been issued for his arrest. The record establishes that investigators visited the defendant’s last known address on three occasions. On the first occasion they interviewed neighbors and located the defendant’s apartment but found that no one was home. No one was home on the second visit either. On the third visit the investigators interviewed the defendant’s mother and sister who informed them that the defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. . GaimariNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- People v. GarafoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Feldsberg v. NitschkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. BrattonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. GarrettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. TobiasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. AllahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. CruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.