Legal Opinion

Pauk v. Pauk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Motion by the appellant, inter alia, for leave to reargue a decision and order of this Court dated June 5, 2000 (273 AD2d 213), in the above-entitled action, which determined an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 28, 1999, and to permit oral argument, and cross motion for an award of an attorney’s fee on the motion.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and cross motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted to the extent that rear*297gument of the decision and order dated June 5, 2000, is granted, and, upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ladd v. . StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Oneida National Bank & Trust Co. v. UnczurAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  3. Pauk v. PaukNew York Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Domino v. DominoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API