Legal Opinion

Gunn v. United States

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 27, 1964No. T-3331PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TEMPLAR, District Judge.

This was an action to recover estate taxes allegedly erroneously paid to the United States of America. The Court has considered the matter on the written stipulation of facts, agreed upon and submitted by the parties, and upon the briefs submitted by counsel.

It was stipulated that the residuary clause of the Will of one Fred A. Isaac-son giving rise to the controversy provided as follows:

“All the remainder of my estate, both real and personal, I give, devise ánd bequeath as follows: To my wife, Etta C. Isaacson, she to give promptly to each of our two children, Donald…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brodrick v. GoreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  2. Estate of Hamilton H. Peyton, Deceased, John L. Peyton, and Olive Peyton v. Commissioner or Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  3. Coleman v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1963

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gaskill v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API