Sheldon v. Estate of Rice
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kalamazoo Circuit.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
The sum demanded in this controversy is claimed to be -due for advances made by the firm of T. P. Sheldon & Go., of which the claimant is survivor, for the benefit of George W. Bice in bis life-time, under a written contract bearing date August 10, 1857, and to which T. P. Sheldon & Go. were the parties of the first part, and David S. Walbridge and George W. Bice the parties of the second part. In tbis contract it was recited that “the above parties have *298agreed to purchase certain lands which are owned or pretended to be- owned by the estate of Justus Burdick and the Farmers & Mechanics’…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
- Torrey v. Bank of OrleansNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
- Moore v. MandlebaumMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Rogers v. RogersCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1829
- Dwight v. BlackmarMichigan Supreme Court · 1852
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Perrin v. LepperMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- In Re Culhane's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Stark v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Baxter v. Union Industrial Trust & Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- White v. PenuelSuperior Court of Delaware · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.