Legal Opinion
United States v. Woodson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 24, 1975No. 74-3379PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before DUNIWAY and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and BURNS,* District Judge. PER CURIAM:
Appellant (Woodson), an employee of the Alameda Naval Air Station (NAS), *551was convicted by a jury of all of the four counts of the indictment. Two charged theft of government property and two charged the sale of that property. 18 U.S.C. § 641. Woodson appeals from the resulting judgments of sentence, claiming error in two respects: (1) insufficiency of the evidence as to ownership and source of the property involved, and (2) error in the jury instructions as to handwriting. We affirm.
The property involved…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. WeiskopfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- United States v. Arnold Marvin RantaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Marvin Jenkins, United States of America v. Ross Prock, United States of America v. Rich WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Donald Wayne Rich A/k/a, Lyle LuncefordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Michael Spano, Sr., Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees, and Bonnie LagiglioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Clifford, RussellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Norwest Financial Consumer Discount Co. v. Koch (In Re Koch)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.