Legal Opinion

Bartholomew v. Rothrock

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 1935No. 224PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*515OPINION

By BODEY, J.

Determination must first be made of the character of the estate conveyed to C. G. Campbell by Armilda Mallow Johnson by the deed referred to in the. petition and the agreed statement of facts. Counsel for the plaintiff urges that this deed conveyed a fee simple title for the reason that the habendum clause thereof is repugnant to the granting clause. We are unable to agree with this contention. It is our view that this deed conveyed to the grantee a base or determinable fee. It is the purpose of the habendum clause of a deed to define the estate which is conveyed. It is the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Methodist Protestant Church v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walker v. Lucas County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Metzger, Exr. v. JoyceOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Willis v. HannahScioto County Court of Common Pleas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API