Legal Opinion

Paul M. Storment, Jr. v. John C. O'malley, Administrator, Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 30, 1991No. 91-1613PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELL, Senior Circuit Judge.

During a state court divorce hearing, plaintiff Paul Storment, an attorney, was inadvertently tape-recorded while encouraging his client to lie on the witness stand. This tape eventually made its way to the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC), where investigators put it to good use. Storment filed a suit in the district court seeking an injunction to prevent the ARDC from using the tape recording in any disciplinary proceeding. The district court entered a final judgment dismissing the suit on abstention grounds because of the pending…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Fenner v. BoykinSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In the Matter of CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Debtor. Appeal of CMC HEARTLAND PARTNERSCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Robert Simpson v. Tim RowanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. Ralph Nader v. John KeithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Rousemary Vega v. Chicago Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
  5. Sterns v. LundbergDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API