Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re County Collector of the County of Winnebago

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 16, 1996No. Nos. 96-1709, 96-1710 and 96-1716Published

1DissentRipple, Circuit Judge

In my view, removal of this action was permissible under the civil rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1443(2).

1

The court, although acknowledging that this court1 and others2 have permitted the removal of state cases that have threatened the implementation of a remedy in a civil rights action, holds that this authority cannot extend to the consent decree here because it did not explicitly order the school district to levy the taxes at issue. Indeed, the court notes that, had the district court explicitly required that the taxes be levied, our case law would permit removal under the statute.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Larry Burns, Etc. v. The Board of School Commissioners of the City of Indianapolis, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  5. James H. Kindred v. Jack R. Duckworth, in His Capacity as Superintendent of the Indiana ReformatoryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API