Legal Opinion

State v. Quimby

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 29, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLINS, Justice.

This is a consolidated appeal from a consolidated jury trial in the Superior Court (Piscataquis County, Beaulieu, J.). Randall and Marsha Quimby appeal from their convictions of arson, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 802 (1983) and conspiracy to commit arson, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 151 (1983) and Shane Cote appeals from his conviction of conspir*29acy to commit arson, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 151 (1983). The Quimbys claim that the M.R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(E) admission of statements made by a co-conspirator was error because there was no evidence independent of the statements sufficient to show a prima facie case…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Ralph PetrozzielloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  2. State v. EstesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. State v. MillettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. State v. CasaleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AhmadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  2. French v. WillmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  3. State v. QuirionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API