Rodriguez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ONION, Presiding Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for driving while intoxicated, where the court assessed punishment at thirty (30) days’ imprisonment and a $100.00 fine, probated.
In appellant’s sole ground of error he multifariously contends that the court erred in admitting into evidence testimony of the administration of a breathalyzer examination and the results because 1) he was not informed that the examination or its results could or would be used against him in court and 2) he did not consent to the examination voluntarily.
We will first address appellant’s contention…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Olson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
3Cited by51 opinions
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- McCambridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Cisneros v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Miffleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Forte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.