Legal Opinion

Davis v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 14, 1964No. 179-59PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge

This action involves thirty-two tracts of land2 claimed to have been invaded by overflights of Government aircraft which appropriated easements of flight for which just compensation must be paid. The Trial Commissioner has made extensive findings and the plaintiffs have taken no exception to them.3 The Government admits a taking with respect to some of the tracts,4 but it hotly disputes that this is true of the others; it challenges, also, the Trial Commissioner’s *614findings on diminution of value. The suit has been tried under the legal standard that a compensable taking occurs when there are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Alva A. Aaron v. The United States. Peter Andersen v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. United States v. 4.43 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Tarrant CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1956
  4. Aaron v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. Jensen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Navajo Tribe of Indians v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  3. Julius Goldman's Egg City v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. Pauley Petroleum Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. Montgomery Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API