Legal Opinion
Herzog v. Foster & Marshall, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 27, 1989No. 24127-3-IPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Per curiam
On June 15, 1989, a Commissioner of this court denied appellants' motion for discretionary review of a trial court order denying appellants' motion for a stay pending arbitration. On September 25, 1989, a panel of this court denied appellants' motion to modify the Commissioner's ruling. Since appellants had also sought review as a matter of right under RAP 2.2(a)(3), respondents 1 then moved to dismiss the appeal. A Commissioner granted the motion to dismiss and appellants now move to modify the Commissioner's ruling. We grant the motion to modify.
Facts
Respondents filed the complaint below as…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Local No. 438 Construction & General Laborers' Union v. CurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mendez v. Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Stein v. Geonerco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Stein v. Geonerco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Woodall v. AVALON CARE CENTER-FEDERAL WAYCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- ML Park Place Corp. v. HedreenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.