Legal Opinion

People v. Weinstein

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Writ oe Error to the Branch “B” Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on writ of error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Edwin K. Walker, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chiee Justice Dunn

delivered the opinion of the court:

Abe Weinstein was convicted in the municipal court of Chicago of pandering, and, the conviction having been affirmed by the Appellate Court, is seeking a reversal on the ground, among others, that the information was defective and should have been quashed upon his motion.

The information was defective and should have been quashed because it was sworn to on July 3, 1909, while it charged the offense to have been committed on July 18, 1909. The same certainty of allegation is required in an information as in an indictment. (Parris v.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dreyer v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Murphy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Garrison v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Gilmer v. WareSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
  5. Parris v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. HillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  2. Rowse v. DISTRICT COURT IN & FOR COUNTY OF ALAMOSASupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  3. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  4. Bishop v. DignanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1921
  5. People v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API