Legal Opinion

(HC) Golden v. Koenig

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 6, 2019No. 1:18-cv-01003Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEROME GOLDEN, Case No. 1:18-cv-01003-JDP (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 13 v. 14 M. E. SPEARMAN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner Jerome Golden, a state prisoner without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus 18 under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. The matter is before the court for screening under Rule 4 of 19 the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Under Rule 4, the judge assigned to the habeas 20 proceeding must examine the habeas petition and order a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Willie Gordon v. Robert DuranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Rinsky v. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  3. William G. Cabrera v. Charles L. Hinsley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  4. Stephen Newman v. Timothy WenglerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API