Lewis v. . Archbell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBkogkeN, J.
The plaintiffs and the defendants, Fry and Garner, were the sole crosstie dealers or brokers at Hemp, which is a small village. Consequently they were competitors. There was evidence tending to show that the defendants, Fry and Garner, and Norfolk Southern Railroad- Company, through its agent, the defendant Archbell, entered into an agreement whereby Fry and Garner contracted to sell crossties only to said railroad company, and said company contracted to purchase ties only from Fry and Garner.
These facts raise 'the following question of law: Does said contract violate C. S., 2563, so as to…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Ellis v. Smith-Broadhurst, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Mayton v. Hiatt's Used Cars, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Ramsey v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Radio Electronics Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Hamm v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of N.C.North Carolina Business Court · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.