Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. McCollum

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1884No. 11,769PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

This was a suit by the appellant against the appellees to recover the possession of real estate. The complaint was in two paragraphs. The defendants jointly *39demurred to each paragraph, and the defendant Farnsley separately demurred to each paragraph. The demurrers alleged want of facts sufficient. They were sustained, and judgment was rendered thereon in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff appealed. The rulings upon the demurrers are assigned as errors.

The only matter urged by the appellees in support of the demurrers is, that in neither of the paragraphs of the complaint is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brown v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Nolte v. LibbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Lewis v. OwenIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Whittelsey v. BeallIndiana Supreme Court · 1839
  5. Magee v. SandersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ault v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Bowen v. WickekshamIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Sebienske v. DowneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API