Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Rouse.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

ActioN by W. B. Cooper, against H. W. Rouse, heard by Judge O. H. Alten and a jury, at December Term, 1901, of the Superior Court of Duplin County. From a judgment for the defendant, the plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

The defendant executed to the plaintiff, on 31st October, 1898, a mortgage on “the following articles of personal property, to-wit, all of my entire stock of merchandise in store at Magnolia, N. 0., or that I may have from túrne to time, until all my account is paid in full; also- all my store fixtures, including desks, seats, lamps, show-cases, etc. * * * But the condition of these presents is such, that whereas, the said W. B. Cooper has agreed to advance to the said H. W. Rouse, goods, wares and merchandise from time to time, extending over a period of twelve months from the date of these…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cheatham v. . HawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  2. Brown v. . DailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Kreth v. . RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  4. Perry v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hickson Lumber Co. v. Gay Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  2. Kenney v. HurlburtOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Marion Mortgage Co. v. TeateSupreme Court of Florida · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API