Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Day

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 26, 1868PublishedCited by 2 opinions

CASE 39 — PETITION ORDINARY — APPEAL PROM BATH CIRCUIT COURT.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE WILLIAMS

delivered the opinion of the court:

In the sale of the,horse by Boyd to Day & Gorrell, there was a general warranty of title, and a special guaranty that they would not be disturbed in his possession, by the military authorities of the United States, because of a brand upon the shoulders. Day & Gorrell, having' sold tbe horse, soon thereafter, some soldiers took *618both, the horse and purchaser to their camp, where the horse was retained by the officer in command, but the purchaser was released from arrest.

Day & .Gorrell refunded the purchase price to their vendee; but whether this…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Payne v. VowelsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Adams v. CraycroftCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API