Legal Opinion

United States v. Greater Blouse, Skirt & Neckwear Contractors' Ass'n

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 8, 1959PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

These are motions by all defendants in a criminal antitrust ease in which three associations, one labor union and five individuals are charged with violations of sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2, in the production of ladies’ blouses in a four-state area.

Defendant Strasser moves under Rule 12, F.R.Crim.P., for dismissal of the indictment. All of the defendants, with the exception of defendant Strasser, move under Rule 14, F.R.Crim.P., for relief from an alleged prejudicial joinder of defendant Strasser, and, under Rules 16 and 17(c),…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Bowman Dairy Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Parr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. United States v. HughesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  3. United States v. Greater Syracuse Board of Realtors, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1977
  4. United States v. Johns-Manville CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. United States v. FancherDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API