Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Eagle Machine Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 21, 1979No. 20993Published

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

This appeal is from orders which refused to require that causes of action be separately stated and refused to find that separate causes of action were improperly joined. We affirm.

Appellant Sperry Rand Corporation sold hydraulic pumps to Sperry Rand Canada, Ltd. which sold the pumps to respondent Eagle Machine Co., Ltd. Eagle manufactured and sold Hawk Automatic Tobacco Pickers, with each picker containing one of the hydraulic pumps. A Hawk tobacco picker was sold to each of the plaintiffs in the sixteen cases on appeal by one of two retail dealers.

When the tobacco pickers…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gasque v. Eagle MacHine Co. LimitedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  2. Winter v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  3. Cooper v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  4. Martin v. KeithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API