Lindley v. Frazier
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
The relationship of daughter-in-law has been held not to raise the presumption that services performed while living within the family are gratuitous. Dunn v. Currie, 141 N.C. 123, 53 S.E. 533; Nesbitt v. Donoho, 198 N.C. 147, 150 S.E. 875; Landreth v. Morris, 214 N.C. 619, 200 S.E. 378; Francis v. Francis, 223 N.C. 401, 26 S.E. 2d 907. But, although the plaintiff may not have been confronted with this presumption to hurdle, the burden still rested upon her to show circumstances from which it might be inferred that the services were rendered and received with the mutual understanding that they…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pew v. First National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Carlson v. KrantzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Francis v. . FrancisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Stewart v. . WyrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Dunn v. Currie.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Johnson v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Twiford v. WaterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Cline v. ClineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Suggs v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Burns v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.