Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ON MÓTIÓÑ FOR CERTIFICATION OF QUESTIONS OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
2Per curiam
We grant Appellants’ July 27, 2015 Motion for Certification of Questions of Great Public Importance and certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court:
AFTER THE ENACTMENT OF SECTION 768.28, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND THE ADOPTION OF FLORIDA SENATE RULE 4.81(6), IS IT CONSTITUTIONALLY PERMISSIBLE FOR THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE TO LIMIT THÉ AMOUNT OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES PAID FROM A GUARDIANSHIP TRUST ESTABLISHED ■ BY A LEGISLATIVE CLAIMS BILL?
CIKLIN, C.J., CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, etc. v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
- Grossman Roth, P.A. v. MellenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, etc. v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017