Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Dowdell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 28, 2002No. CR-01-0610Published

1Concurrence

I concur to affirm the summary denial of Dowdell's Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition for postconviction relief, although not for the reasons stated by the majority.

Like Judge Baschab, who filed a dissenting opinion in this case, I fully recognize the need for, and the importance of, postconviction DNA testing in certain cases — especially in capital-murder cases in which the death penalty has been imposed.

"A criminal trial is not a lottery, a spin of the roulette wheel or a throw of the dice. The orderly processing of cases through the court is an important value, but it is not the end in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Giles v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API