Dowdell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Concurrence
I concur to affirm the summary denial of Dowdell's Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition for postconviction relief, although not for the reasons stated by the majority.
Like Judge Baschab, who filed a dissenting opinion in this case, I fully recognize the need for, and the importance of, postconviction DNA testing in certain cases — especially in capital-murder cases in which the death penalty has been imposed.
"A criminal trial is not a lottery, a spin of the roulette wheel or a throw of the dice. The orderly processing of cases through the court is an important value, but it is not the end in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Giles v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.