Christian v. Properties known as Newfound Bay
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
Irvin A. Sewer appeals the District Court’s denial of his post-judgment motion *448to vacate the judgment by consent to which he agreed in 1994. In denying Sewer’s motion, the District Court rejected his challenge to its subject-matter jurisdiction as unsupported. It also found that Sewer’s motion seeking relief from the Consent Judgment based on a mutual mistake theory was not timely. Sewer appeals. For the reasons noted below, we agree with the District Court and therefore affirm its denial of Sewer’s motion.
I
The factual history of this case is long and complex.1…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. One Toshiba Color Television Two Answering MacHines One Health Tech Computer Reginald McGlory in No. 98-3578 (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) (d.c. Civ. No. 90-Cv-00138) United States of America v. Assorted Jewelry Reginald McGlory in No. 98-3579 (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) (d.c. Civ. No. 90-Cv-00370)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Stradley v. CortezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Harris v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Lasky v. Continental Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Isidor Paiewonsky Associates, Inc. v. Sharp Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. American Home Products Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- In Re Diet Drugs Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. NEIL KAMAL, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2022