Legal Opinion

Ciulla v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 12, 1930No. 12946PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is embezzlement, a felony; the punishment confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

Appellant is an attorney-at-law. Letha Scott, a negress, who had shot her husband and was under complaint charging her with assault with intent to murder, employed appellant to defend her. It appears from the state’s testimony that she had not known appellant until he called at the jail and requested her to employ him. According to her testimony, a fee of two hundred and fifty dollars for the examining trial was agreed upon. After the examining trial, the fee was fixed in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Cowan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. McCann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Brady v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1977
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API