Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Apfel

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided August 6, 1998No. 3:97CV330-PPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROBERT D. POTTER, Senior District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on a Memorandum and Recommendation (“M & R”) of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Carl Horn, entered on 18 June 1998. Plaintiff filed an objection .and the Government responded.

The Court must conduct a de novo review of those portions of the report or proposed findings and recommendations to which objection is made. 28 U.S.C.A. § 686(b)(1) (West 1993). The Court has reviewed the pertinent legal authorities and the objections made. After conducting this review, the Court finds that the record supports the…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Garcia Jay Wright v. George Collins, Warden, Maryland Penitentiary Dr. Berry Officer Larry DonnellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Terry M. Mitchell v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  2. Clear Sky Car Wash, LLC v. City of ChesapeakeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
  3. Helton v. GoodDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2002
  4. Belcher v. ApfelDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1999
  5. Daniel Palmer, Stacie Palmer, and S.P. v. Virginia High School League, Inc. and Roanoke County School BoardDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API