Legal Opinion

Delfino v. Ulrich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 16, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), entered May 28, 1990, which granted the defen*512dant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The plaintiffs’ notice of appeal from the decision of the same court, entered May 1, 1992, is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the order and judgment (see, CPLR 5520 [a]).

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the defendant and dismissed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lauer v. RappAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Murphy v. SteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Kazakias v. BistricerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API