Legal Opinion

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Berousek

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1999No. 22464Published

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Presiding Judge.

This appeal arises out of a 1996 judgment originally entered in Clark County, Nevada, in favor of Plaintiff, People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (hereinafter PETA), and others, against Defendant, Bohumil Berousek, a/k/a Bobby Berosini. Pursuant to Rule 74.14, PETA filed a Petition for Registration of Foreign Judgment in the Circuit Court of Taney County, on March 17, 1998. PETA later filed two requests for garnishment. Berosini appeals the denial of his motion to quash one of the garnishments.

The Nevada judgment ordered Defendant to pay PETA $228,625.48, plus…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of LaffertyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Runny Meade Estates, Inc. v. Datapage Technologies International, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Oliver v. FisherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. United States v. Among Others, an Article of Drug for Veterinary UseDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API