Legal Opinion

Kish v. Chipman Chemical Engineering Co.

New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau

Decided July 1, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

There being no dispute concerning the happening of the accident, which resulted in the death of the petitioner’s husband on December 17th, 1927, and it being admitted by the respondent that said accident happened out of and during the course of employment, and the parties thereto and their respective counsel having agreed on the foregoing:

I do find and determine as follows:

The petitioner is the widow of one John A. Kish, who “during his lifetime resided on Jersey avenue, in the city of New Brunswick, and was emploj'ed by the respondent at its plant in Middlesex borough, Bound Brook, New…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mayor of Jersey v. BorstSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kolakowski v. Thomas Mfg. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  2. Santiago v. NJ Fireworks Mfg. Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API